Danna Smith on Dogwood’s Forests Aren’t Fuel Campaign

May 28th, 2013 by

Today, Dogwood Alliance and our long-time partner, Natural Resources Defense Council, launched Our Forests Aren’t Fuel, a campaign to stop the large-scale burning of trees for electricity. It’s no coincidence that the launch of this new effort coincides with today’s Wall Street Journal front-page story exposing how Southern wetland forests are being clearcut, turned into pellets and shipped overseas to be burned in European power stations.

For over a year now, we’ve been doing our homework, researching the market trends, identifying the major corporate players and investigating the impacts on the ground. We’ve been cultivating partnerships and allies (check out the 75 groups signed on to our campaign platform) and informing the media, including, of course, the Wall Street Journal, who we extensively briefed on the issues leading up to today’s article. We’ve been preparing for just the right moment to expose the inconvenient truths about burning wood for electricity: it not only threatens wildlife and water resources in the world’s most biologically diverse temperate forest, but it also threatens to accelerate climate change, endangering life as we know it on planet Earth. Today, the smoking gun is revealed, with evidence that trees from clearcut 100-year old wetland forests in the Southern US were burned as fuel to generate electricity. 

Misdirected renewable energy policies both here in the US and in Europe treat biomass, including the burning of trees, as renewable energy just like solar and wind. With billions of dollars of government subsidies available, over the past several years, major utility companies have been converting coal burning power plants to wood, even though there is a mounting body of scientific evidence that burning trees for electricity releases more carbon into the atmosphere than burning coal. In a rush to find much-needed alternatives to fossil fuels, this inconvenient truth, along with evidence that it’s destroying forests, has been largely ignored.

The Economist recently hit the nail on the head in depicting the practice of burning trees for electricity with an illustration of a caveman lighting a fire with sticks in hand. With the emerging technologies of solar and wind power, burning trees as fuel for electricity is indeed quite primitive and clumsy by comparison. The use of forests as a primary fuel source is taking us backward, not forward, on the path to clean energy.

Europe is currently at the forefront of this rush to burn, which has led to an explosion of new facilities here in the South that are chopping down our forests, turning them into wood pellets and exporting them across the Atlantic. Currently, the Southern US is the world’s largest exporter of wood pellets. Wood pellet exports to Europe from the South doubled from 1.5 million tons to over 3 million tons over the past year and are projected to double again to 6 million tons by 2015.

Trees from clearcut wetland forests like this one are being turned into wood pellets and shipped overseas to burn for electricity.

At the head of the pack in Europe is Drax, who is investing billions of dollars to convert dirty old coal plants to wood burning. Much of the wood comes in the form of pellets from the Southern US. Drax is not alone, with many of Europe’s largest utilities including Electrabel, GDF Suez, Dong, and Forth burning wood pellets imported from the US South to generate electricity as well.

Domestic utilities here in the South are not far behind the Europeans. All of the top utilities in the South already have some capacity to burn wood for electricity with plans for further expansion in the future. Currently, Dominion Power in Virginia leads the pack. Other companies are not far behind like Southern Company, Duke Power, TVA, and Florida Power & Lights, who all have plans of their own.

The largest company pelletizing forests in the South is Maryland-based Enviva. Though they claim that the trees they use come from “sustainable forestry”, Enviva ‘s sourcing of wood from clearcut cypress tupelo wetland forests along the North Carolina Virginia coast was revealed today by not only the Wall Street Journal but also the BBC.

What an embarrassment this must be to Virginia’s Dominion Power and Drax in the UK, both of whom rely on Enviva for wood to burn. Drax purchases wood pellets exported to Europe by Enviva and Dominion Power buys the leftover tops and limbs from Enviva’s operations. Both Drax and Dominion claim that they hold their wood suppliers to high standards of forestry. The fact that Enviva has been caught sourcing from clearcut wetlands is yet another inconvenient truth I am sure these companies don’t want to hear. I suspect the other huge wood pellet companies, including Georgia Biomass, Green Circle, and more have some inconvenient truths of their own that will come out in due time.

Before that happens, however, these companies can make the right choice. The leaders in this fiasco, Dominion Power, Drax and Enviva, can set a better example by choosing not to burn trees for electricity and announcing their leadership in developing non-destructive, clean energy sources that will actually reduce carbon emissions. As leading developers of forests as a fuel source, these companies now have an opportunity to take swift and decisive action before additional investments are made and the problem reaches a scale that is irreversible for our forests and climate.

Our wetland forests provide critical habitat to countless species of plants and animals, and they protect coastal communities from flooding and serve as vital carbon sinks. Our wetland forests are many things, but they are NOT fuel.

Now, more than ever, we should fast-track investment in clean energy such as solar and wind while simultaneously accelerating efforts to protect forests. Our forests are vital for clean air, clean drinking water, flood control, wildlife habitat, and protect us from climate change. They should not be burnt for electricity – our forests aren’t fuel.

Read more about Our Forests Aren’t Fuel

Take Action: Tell these companies that burning our forests for fuel isn’t green! 


8 Responses to Danna Smith on Dogwood’s Forests Aren’t Fuel Campaign

  1. Mrs. Stephanie and Mr. Jim Lodge

    This crazy policy will clear the Planet of its tree cover even faster!

    Leaf the forests alone, don’t desert the Planets’ forests!

  2. Greg Hamby

    i cannot agree that burning wood for electricity is the thing to do. Non lumber species are where the forests are or were untouched. It takes 40+ years for a bottomland forest to grow back. How quickly is an acre of it burned as pellets? It is an unstainable proposition. Even using logging and sawmill
    waste will not provide enough fuel. The pellet industry will begin to use mature trees and already has. Natural Gas is the bridge to real renewable power.

  3. W.V. McConnell

    My just posted comment should have linked to this webpage. http://www.wvmcconnell.net/?page_id=256

  4. W.V. McConnell

    “Our Forests Aren’t Fuel” makes a good sound bite but fails to recognize that judicious energy wood harvesting can solve real and complex problems that face forest managers. Check out this webpage for specific examples of where biomass harvesting would benefit the environment, the public, and the landowner.
    http://www.wvmcconnell.net/?page_id=382

  5. Pingback: Mary Ellen Harte: Climate Change This Week: Mothers Out Front, Baby Birds Imperiled, and More! | Elm River Free Press

  6. Jeff Keels

    Oh, I see you guys found one area, who had been cut and used for burning of electricity. What about property rights of the owners? I am a tree farmer, and I will sell to the highest bidder, whether that be for lumber, paper or the consumption of electricity. My tree farms are sustainable and therefore, monies I get from harvesting goes back into my farms to produce more trees.

    • Amanda Rodriguez

      Have you considered the Carbon Canopy Project? This project is designed to help landowners, corporations, and environmental groups come together, making it so that landowners, like yourself, get paid to leave some trees in their woods as well as to harvest to FSC (Forest Stewardship Council) standards. If you’re interested, we’d love to talk to you more about it!

  7. Pingback: “Our Forests Aren’t Fuel” campaign launched | A New Century of Forest Planning

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>