Tell the USDA NO WAY on Genetically Engineered Trees

Imagine a future where our forests resemble a Sci-Fi horror movie – a harsh landscape empty of biological diversity, overgrown with frankentrees planted only to produce resources for a polluting energy industry. If ArborGen, with the help of the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), has their way, that dismal nightmare could become a reality.

That is why I’m asking you to submit public comments by April 29th, demanding the USDA reject frankenforests and protect the biological diversity of the Southern US. The USDA is accepting public comments on a request by GE tree company ArborGen to commercially sell hundreds of millions of freeze-tolerant genetically engineered eucalyptus trees annually for vast plantations across Texas, Florida, Georgia, Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi and South Carolina.

The only way to stop GE trees from becoming a dangerous invasive species that contaminates native forests is to ban the commercial release of GE trees before it’s too late.

Tell the USDA that GE freeze-tolerant eucalyptus plantations pose an unprecedented threat to forests and wildlife in the US and around the world. Tell them to reject ArborGen’s request to commercially sell billions of GE eucalyptus trees.

TAKE ACTION – Submit comments to the U.S. government

Watch our 5 minute video on the impacts of timber plantations & GE trees

Watch our 5 minute video on the impacts of timber plantations and GE trees.

Non-GE eucalyptus plantations already have devastating impacts all over the world. Based on these documented impacts, GE eucalyptus plantations in the US will likely cause:

  • Clearcutting of biodiverse forests for conversion to industrial GE eucalyptus plantations–called “green deserts” due to their devastating impacts on biodiversity
  • Invasive spread of GE eucalyptus trees into native ecosystems–eucalyptus are already a documented invasive species in Florida and California
  • Increased danger of firestorms – eucalyptus contain a highly volatile oil and are explosively flammable
  • Displacement of wildlife that cannot use the non-native eucalyptus trees for habitat or food
  • Contamination of soils and groundwater with toxic agrochemicals used on the plantations
  • Worsening of drought – eucalyptus have deep tap roots, monopolize ground water and dry up soils
  • Worsening of climate change through the destruction of carbon rich native forests for carbon poor plantations.

In addition to the points above, you can find more on the dangers of GE trees and detailed information for your comments in our GE trees fact sheet.

Find out even more from Dogwood Alliance Executive Director, Danna Smith, and other experts about the effects of fast-growing timber and GE trees.

Read the full 580 page petition requesting deregulation of freeze-tolerant GE eucalyptus trees here.

Join the Campaign Against GE Trees & Eucalyptus Plantations!

From May 26-June 1, industry leaders, scientists and policy makers will meet in Asheville, NC for the Tree Biotechnology 2013 Conference. The conference will discuss current and future applications of GE trees, such as large-scale plantations of GE eucalyptus trees in the southern United States, from South Carolina to Texas.

The STOP GE Trees Campaign is mobilizing events and protests in Asheville calling for a ban on the release of GE trees into the environment.  To be alerted to updates on this situation and get involved in these events or the campaign to stop GE eucalyptus trees, email [email protected] or go to www.nogetrees.org

 

3 Responses to “Tell the USDA NO WAY on Genetically Engineered Trees”

  1. Randolph Wilson

    GE eucalyptus are a danger to the US. This spieces is a well documented invasive spieces, highly flammable plus being cabable of drying up ground water sources.

    This spieces is intended to replace native southern hardwoods, that huge timber companies have historically destroyed in order to plant more pine spieces. Now the ‘loggable’ hardwoods are all but gone and the GE eucalyptus has been chosen to take the place of native hardwoods in order for the huge timber companies have an altenative hardwood fiber source.

    The ironic thing here is….International Paper is a partner in ArborGen….though now owns no US timberlands. IP does however have a silent partners…those companies who purchased the former IP lands including Resource Managment Services which will… in all likely hood….. gladly permit planting of this invasive spieces of eucalyptus.

    Now Dogwood Alliance has entered into a working partnership with IP to to map and protect endangered forests….i.e, “discourage the conversion of natural hardwood forests to pine plantations and expand FSC certification expand Forest Conservation in the Southern US.”

    I hope these efforts expand to include….NO GE Eucalyptus plantations in the South.

    Reply
  2. Christopher Evans

    Non-GE eucalyptus plantations already have devastating impacts all over the world. Based on these documented impacts, GE eucalyptus plantations in the US will likely cause:
    Clearcutting of biodiverse forests for conversion to industrial GE eucalyptus plantations–called “green deserts” due to their devastating impacts on biodiversity.
    Invasive spread of GE eucalyptus trees into native ecosystems–eucalyptus are already a documented invasive species in Florida and California.
    Increased danger of firestorms – eucalyptus contain a highly volatile oil and are explosively flammable.
    Displacement of wildlife that cannot use the non-native eucalyptus trees for habitat or food.
    Contamination of soils and groundwater with toxic agrochemicals used on the plantations.
    Worsening of drought – eucalyptus have deep tap roots, monopolize ground water and dry up soils.
    Worsening of climate change through the destruction of carbon rich native forests for carbon poor plantations.

    Reply
  3. David Addison

    We do not want or need any genetically engineered anything. Whenever a human says that we are expedited natural selection, such a statement is a total lie.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>